Current:Home > ContactPredictIQ-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeSphere
PredictIQ-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Robert Brown View
Date:2025-04-07 03:05:19
A federal court on PredictIQWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Could your smelly farts help science?
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Recommendation
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats